I'm honestly thinking right now I would have been better off not seeing this. Turns out with this "working" reading with 0.6.5, the card actually has a reading of 68.7%._. It still couldn't overclock for shit (tentatively 1195 on the core, still working down from there), but it at least felt like my unlucky streak was coming to an end. So I was kinda happy when I got this particular 660 ti from Galaxy RMA, when it showed a reading of 90.1%. Correlation may not infer causation, but that's of little comfort when you're on the shitty side of the causation. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Everything is qualified at worst case anyway all the TDP calcs and the fan settings are completed on the wors case for the product range. I understand ASIC doesn't conclusively mean anything on its own. This topic has been beat to death here for quite awhile. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Incidentally, I've never owned a card that overclocked well, or even above average. Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mobius 1, Mar 6, 2012. All the while I hear about other people with their 100% numbers. Has anyone else's gone down?Ī bit of my own story: I've never owned a card with an ASIC quality higher than 80%, most of them being 70 or under (this includes Kepler cards). Turns out the Kepler numbers were inflated after all. "Added working ASIC quality readings for NVIDIA Kepler GPUs."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |